Twitter has provided updated details on its investigation into Russian election interference on its platform in 2016. Its identification of more than 13,000 more Russian-linked bots that made election-related tweets puts the total over 50,000. Additionally, about 3,800 (up 1,000 from Twitter’s data in the fall) were affiliated with the now-notorious Internet Research Agency.
Still, Twitter refused that these accounts were a significant problem:
The outcome of this supplemental analysis are consistent with the results of our previous work: automated election-related content affiliated with Russian signals represented a very small fraction of the overall activity on Twitter in the ten-week period before the 2016 election.
As if to signifies the different scales at work here, the Twitter blog post then changed topics to its efforts to block bots and suspicious activity throughout the platform.
As reference, during that 10-week period, those 3,800 IRA bots tweeted about 176,000 times. Among which less than 15,000 were concerned to election. And 677,775 people saw, followed or retweeted one of these accounts during that same period, and are being notified.
Example of some of the IRA-bot-promoted content on Twitter.
But in a way that’s just a drop in the bucket.
The company wrote, “In December 2017, our systems identified and challenged more than 6.4 million suspicious accounts globally per week. Since June 2017, we’ve removed more than 220,000 applications in violation of our rules, collectively responsible for more than 2.2 billion low-quality Tweets.”
It’s not exactly apples to apples, but it is a good reminder that this was more of an experiment in influence, not a full-scale push. If simple spammers can create and promote bots by the tens of thousands, Russian intelligence could easily have brought more to bear here.
Of course, the counts are much greater on Facebook — some 150 million people are estimated to have been reached by troll accounts there.
Lastly, Twitter explains some concrete steps it’s taking to make the elections of 2018 a bit less susceptible to this type of interference, which, while not actually too grand in scale, was certainly more widespread than predicted.
Specifically, the company is working on verifying all candidates, escalating issues of impersonation or hijacking, and monitoring election-related conversations closely for evidence of manipulation or bot participation.
Featured Image: Bryce Durbin/TechCrunch/Getty Images
more recommended stories
Wikimedia says interest in and adoption of the Zero program have both dropped sharply since 2016
Six years after launching Wikipedia Zero,.
UPS working in partnership with Workhorse to develop 50 custom-built electric delivery trucks
UPS will work with partner a.
Hover : A Computer vision startup that permits consumers to easily create 3D models of their homes
As more and more startups focus.
Airbus recently had the first ever successful flight
Airbus recently had the first.
Kakao games business receives $130M funds from Tencent and others ahead of IPO
Korea’s prominent messaging company Kakao is.
Facebook is amping up its Community Help effort to assist people in crisis
Facebook is amping up its Community.
Workast raises cash to expand its toolkit to other messaging platforms
The popular task management, Workast, has.
Pharmaceutical firm Roche acquires Flatiron in a $1.9 billion deal
Swiss pharmaceutical company Roche has made.
Axel Springer to buy a stake in Magic Leap
Magic Leap is a U.S. startup.
Bharat Vasan appointed as the new CEO of PAX Labs
PAX Labs, an American electronic cigarette.